Comparison of methods for the evaluation of adaptability and stability for yield in cotton genotypes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2008.v43.122Keywords:
<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i>, AMMI analysis, assesment of cultivars, ecovalence, genotype x environment interaction.Abstract
The objective of this work was to compare different methods used to estimate adaptability and stability of 17 cotton genotypes evaluated in 23 locations of the Brazilian savannah. Genotype and environment effects and genotype x environment interaction were significant. According to ecovalence and AMMI models, cultivar BRS Cedro showed the best stability. Varieties Delta Penta and BRS Ipê were among the most unstable genotypes, but not among the most productive. Using the methods of Eberhart & Russel, Lin & Binns and Annicchiarico, genotypes BRS 269 – Buriti, FMT 701 and CNPA GO 2001-999 were the most stable and among the five most productive on average. The evaluation of the specific adaptabilities provided by the AMMI analysis is of great importance in the study of the behavior of genotypes. The amount of information generated and the facilities of interpretation favors Lin & Binns method, which can be complemented by an AMMI analysis.Downloads
Published
2008-10-17
How to Cite
Silva Filho, J. L., Morello, C. L., Farias, F. J. C., Lamas, F. M., Pedrosa, M. B., & Ribeiro, J. L. (2008). Comparison of methods for the evaluation of adaptability and stability for yield in cotton genotypes. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 43(3), 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2008.v43.122
Issue
Section
GENETICS
