Social entrepreneurship – essayistic training supported by cartographic-categorical insights

Authors

  • Fabiana Pinto de Almeida Bizarria Psicóloga, doutora em Administração de Empresas, professora do curso de Administração da Faculdade Luciano Feijão (FLF), professora colaboradora do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gestão Pública na UFPI (Mestrado Profissional), em pós-doutoramento no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE.
  • Flávia Lorenne Sampaio Barbosa Administradora, doutora em Administração de Empresas, docente do curso de graduação em Administração da UFPI, docente permanente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gestão Pública e do Programa de Pós-graduação em Administração Pública (PROFIAP), ambos da UFPI, Floriano, PI.
  • Danielle Maria Apolonio Rodrigues Geógrafa, mestranda em Gestão Pública na Universidade Federal do Piauí (PPGP/UFPI), membro do Núcleo de Pesquisa em Gestão Pública (NUPEGEP), professora intérprete de libras do Governo do Estado do Maranhão, São Luís, MA.
  • Thais de Sousa Costa Graduanda em Administração, Teresina, PI.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35977/0104-1096.cct2022.v39.26932

Keywords:

social enterprise, social businesses, social organizations

Abstract

This study aims to provide contributions to the configuration of the social entrepreneurship theme in Brazilian research. This study performs a systematic review and adds two analyses to better understand the cartography of 47 national researches on the subject, from 2014 to 2020. Through lexical analysis, made possible by the Iramuteq software, combined with content analysis, from the perspective of categorization, and supported by the ATLAS.ti software, configuration elements and possibilities of theoretical insights were gathered and discussed for further analysis through theorization processes, which that theme requires. Five clusters are discussed: academic production (18.6%, ECUs), research methodologies (24.2%, ECUs), social questions/analysis/problems (24.8%, ECUs), social management (of/for/from), (16.8%, ECUs), and engagement (15.5%, ECUs). In summary, the results show the resulting theoretical weaknesses and problems, and brings about discussions on networks, social impacts, conceptual imagination, creativity (creation of social value), relational learning, entrepreneurial process, social agents/actors, collective processes and responsive leadership, given the contribution of social entrepreneurship in the sewing of concrete possibilities of developments that add to life in society.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-10

How to Cite

Bizarria, F. P. de A., Barbosa, F. L. S., Rodrigues, D. M. A., & Costa, T. de S. (2022). Social entrepreneurship – essayistic training supported by cartographic-categorical insights. Science & Technology Journals, 39(1), e26932. https://doi.org/10.35977/0104-1096.cct2022.v39.26932

Issue

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Artigos

License

After publication of the work, the Authors are authorized to non-exclusively distribute the version of the published work (for example: publish in an institutional repository, as a book chapter, create links on electronic pages, etc.), as long as the authorship and initial publication in this journal are mentioned.