PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE: EPISTEMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT THE PRINCIPLE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE RISK ANALYSIS PROCESS

Authors

  • Frederico Gonçalves Cezar
  • Paulo César Coelho Abrantes

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35977/0104-1096.cct2003.v20.8743

Keywords:

gestão de risco, direito ambiental, filosofia da ciência, filosofia da tecnologia, previsão tecnológica.

Abstract

This paper analyzes, from an epistemological perspective, the so called 'Precautionary Principle' - an environmental law principle broadly invoked in judicial and administrative debates concerning the commercial liberation of new technologies, especially in the biotechnological domain. Starting with the phrasing stated in the 1992 Rio Declaration, we argue that different interpretations of the Precautionary Principle are possible. These interpretations vary according to presuppositions concerning the nature of scientific and technological knowledge as well as the Risk Analysis´ stages in which the Principle is applied. The paper includes a historical overview of different phrasings of the Principle, which can be found in different documents and legislations, and an analysis of its structure, alongside a general epistemological analysis of the notion of scientific certainty and of the nature of technological predictions.

Author Biographies

Frederico Gonçalves Cezar

Advogado, Mestre em Filosofia pela Universidade de Brasília – UnB –, analista de Estudos da Confederação Nacional da Indústria – CNI –, SQSW 504, Bl. H, Apto 403, Brasília, DF, CEP 70673-508, Fone: (61) 317-9338, Fax.: (61) 317-9330.

Paulo César Coelho Abrantes

Doutor em Filosofia pela Universidade de Paris I (Sorbonne), professor de Filosofia da Universidade de Brasília – UnB –, SQN 416, Bl I, Apto 306, CEP 70879-090, Fone: (61) 307-2728.

Published

2003-01-01

How to Cite

Gonçalves Cezar, F., & Coelho Abrantes, P. C. (2003). PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE: EPISTEMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT THE PRINCIPLE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE RISK ANALYSIS PROCESS. Science & Technology Journals, 20(2), 225–262. https://doi.org/10.35977/0104-1096.cct2003.v20.8743

Issue

Section

Ensaios