Growth and survival of tilapia chitralada submitted to different photoperiods

Authors

  • Katia Santos Bezerra Federal Rural University of Pernambuco image/svg+xml
  • Athiê Jorge Guerra Santos Federal Rural University of Pernambuco image/svg+xml
  • Maxwel Rozendo Leite Federal Rural University of Pernambuco image/svg+xml
  • Alexandre Magnun da Silva Federal Rural University of Pernambuco image/svg+xml
  • Misleni Ricarte de Lima Federal Rural University of Pernambuco image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2008.v43.76

Keywords:

<i>Oreochromis niloticus</i>, growth, light period, survival

Abstract

The objective of this work was to assess the effect of photoperiod in the growth and survival of tilapia chitralada, Oreochromis niloticus, during and after the sexual reversion. The work was carried out in 2006 and 2007, and divided into two experiments. In the first experiment, post-larvae of 0.031±0.0058 g and 1.24±0.096 cm were used, at the density of 1.5 post-larva L-1. The post-larvae were submitted to the following photoperiods: 0, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours of light and 12.5 hours of natural light, during 28 days. The fishes were fed with 45% crude protein balanced food, containing androgen hormone, at 20% of the total biomass, divided into four meals. Sampling was done at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. In the second experiment, sex reverted fingerlings of 0.38±0.16 g and 2.81±0.40 cm were used. The experiment protocols were the same as in the former experiment, except for the stock density (0.33 fish L-1), food ratio (10% of the total biomass) and the experimental period (46 days). Sampling was done every fifteen days. The photoperiod interfered more intensively in the survival of the tilapia post-larvae, and the natural light was the recommended photoperiod during the sexual reversion. The best survival rate of the fingerlings occurred in the 0-hour light group; regarding fingerling growth, however, better results in bodyweight and length were found in the other photoperiod groups. It seems that the photoperiod responses to survival and growth are related to fish age.

Author Biographies

  • Athiê Jorge Guerra Santos, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco
    Derpartamento de Pesca e Aqüicultura área Fisioecologia de animais aquáticos
  • Maxwel Rozendo Leite, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco
    Departamento de Pesca e Aqüicultura
  • Alexandre Magnun da Silva, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco
    Departamento de Pesca e Aqüicultura
  • Misleni Ricarte de Lima, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco
    Departamento de Zootecnia

Published

2008-10-20

Issue

Section

PISCICULTURE

How to Cite

Bezerra, K. S., Santos, A. J. G., Leite, M. R., Silva, A. M. da, & Lima, M. R. de. (2008). Growth and survival of tilapia chitralada submitted to different photoperiods. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 43(6), 737-743. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2008.v43.76

Similar Articles

1-10 of 50

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)