Yield and nutritional composition of oyster mushroom strains newly introduced in Bangladesh

Authors

  • Mostak Ahmed University of Malaya image/svg+xml
  • Noorlidah Abdullah University of Malaya image/svg+xml
  • Kamal Uddin Ahmed Sher-e-Bangla agricultural University
  • M. H. M. Borhannuddin Bhuyan Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2013.v48.13041

Keywords:

Pleurotus, fruiting body, mushroom cultivation, proximate composition, yield components.

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate yield and chemical composition of oyster mushroom strains newly introduced in Bangladesh. Strains of Pleurotus high‑king (strain PHK), P. ostreatus (strain PO2), and P. geesteranus (strains PG1 and PG3) were evaluated as to yield components and proximate composition. Pleurotus ostreatus was used as control. Pleurotus high‑king showed fastest growth of primordia, but moderate flush of effective fruiting bodies. Pleurotus geesteranus (PG1) showed higher economic yield and biological performance, and better chemical composition, especially in terms of protein and mineral contents. Pleurotus geesteranus (PG1) shows better performance than P. ostreatus (PO2), the most commercially cultivated edible species in Bangladesh, and, therefore, it should be recommended for commercial cultivation.

Author Biographies

  • Mostak Ahmed, University of Malaya

    Mushroom Research Center

    PhD Student

  • Noorlidah Abdullah, University of Malaya

    Mushroom Research Center

    Professor

  • Kamal Uddin Ahmed, Sher-e-Bangla agricultural University

    Department of Biochemistry

    Professor

  • M. H. M. Borhannuddin Bhuyan, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute

    Soil Sciene Division

    Scientific Officer

Downloads

Published

2013-04-18

Issue

Section

MICROBIOLOGY

How to Cite

Ahmed, M., Abdullah, N., Ahmed, K. U., & Bhuyan, M. H. M. B. (2013). Yield and nutritional composition of oyster mushroom strains newly introduced in Bangladesh. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 48(2), 197-202. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2013.v48.13041