Pruning dates and productivity of cassava

Authors

  • Eduardo Barreto Aguiar UNESP
  • Silvio José Bicudo UNESP
  • Felipe Curcelli UNESP
  • Priscila Gonzales Figueiredo UNESP
  • Simério Carlos Silva Cruz UEG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2011.v46.10747

Keywords:

Manihot esculenta, cultural practices, rest period, dry matter content

Abstract

The objective of this work was to assess different pruning dates on the development, production and quality of cassava roots. Two experiments were carried out in two regions of the state of São Paulo, Brazil: Botucatu, on clay soil, and São Manuel, on sandy soil. The experiments were carried out from September 2008 to June 2010, and harvest was done after two growing seasons (22 months). The experimental design was a randomized block design, with four replicates. Ten treatments, nine monthly pruning dates, between April and December, and a control cultivated without pruning were evaluated. Pruning dates were statistically analyzed by orthogonal contrasts, in comparison to the control, and by regression. Cassava pruning during the rest period does not alter dry matter content and root yield. However, when performed at the end of the first cycle or after the start of the second cycle, pruning reduces dry matter content and root yield.

Author Biographies

Eduardo Barreto Aguiar, UNESP

Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas da Universidade Estadual Paulista - FCA/UNESP

Silvio José Bicudo, UNESP

Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas da Universidade Estadual Paulista - FCA/UNESP

Felipe Curcelli, UNESP

Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas da Universidade Estadual Paulista - FCA/UNESP

Priscila Gonzales Figueiredo, UNESP

Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas da Universidade Estadual Paulista - FCA/UNESP

Simério Carlos Silva Cruz, UEG

Universidade Estadual de Goiás

 

Published

2012-02-09

How to Cite

Aguiar, E. B., Bicudo, S. J., Curcelli, F., Figueiredo, P. G., & Cruz, S. C. S. (2012). Pruning dates and productivity of cassava. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 46(11), 1463–1470. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2011.v46.10747

Issue

Section

CROP SCIENCE