Meta‑analysis of the use of oilseeds and oils in ewe and goat diets

Authors

  • Andrés Luis Martínez Marín Universidad de Córdoba, Departamento de Producción Animal
  • Nieves Núñez Sánchez Universidad de Córdoba, Departamento de Producción Animal,
  • Ana Isabel Garzón Sigler Universidad de Córdoba, Departamento de Producción Animal
  • Francisco Peña Blanco Universidad de Córdoba, Departamento de Producción Animal
  • Valeriano Domenech García Universidad de Córdoba, Departamento de Producción Animal
  • Fuensanta Hernández Ruipérez Universidad de Murcia, Departamento de Producción Animal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2015.v50.20101

Keywords:

unsaturated fatty acids, fat, milk, animal production, protein

Abstract

The objective of this work was to use meta‑analysis to study the productive results of ewe and goat fed oil and seed, rich in unsatured fat acid. Twenty‑two experiments with ewes (63 treatments) and 21 experiments with goats (76 treatments) were used. Average extra fat intake was 83.6±33.6 g per day in ewes, and 73.4±38.7 g per day in goats. In ewes, extra fat intake did not affect dry matter intake, but increased milk fat yield (from 91.4 to 98.8 g per day) and reduced milk protein content (from 5.41 to 5.24%). There were no differences in the sum of fat and protein contents. In goats, extra fat included in the diet reduced dry matter intake (from 2.13 to 2.08 kg per day), and increased milk fat percentage (from 4.11 to 4.43%) and the sum of fat and protein contents (from 7.41 to 7.76%). The yield responses to the intake of diets enriched with unsaturated fatty acids differ between ewes and goats. However, milk commercial value is not affected because of the absence of negative effects on the sum of fat and protein contents in both species.

Published

2015-10-09

How to Cite

Martínez Marín, A. L., Núñez Sánchez, N., Garzón Sigler, A. I., Peña Blanco, F., Domenech García, V., & Hernández Ruipérez, F. (2015). Meta‑analysis of the use of oilseeds and oils in ewe and goat diets. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 50(9), 821–828. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2015.v50.20101

Issue

Section

ANIMAL NUTRITION