Interceptions of quarantine and absent non‑regulated pests in imported plant material

Authors

  • Marcelo Lopes-da-Silva Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Parque Estação Biológica, Caixa Postal 02372, CEP 70770‑917 Brasília, DF, Brasil.
  • Norton Polo Benito Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Parque Estação Biológica, Caixa Postal 02372, CEP 70770‑917 Brasília, DF, Brasil.
  • Márcio Martinello Sanches Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Parque Estação Biológica, Caixa Postal 02372, CEP 70770‑917 Brasília, DF, Brasil.
  • Abi Soares dos Anjos Marques Embrapa Quarentena Vegetal, Caixa Postal 02372, CEP 70770‑917 Brasília, DF, Brasil.
  • Denise Návia Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Parque Estação Biológica, Caixa Postal 02372, CEP 70770‑917 Brasília, DF, Brasil.
  • Vilmar Gonzaga Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Parque Estação Biológica, Caixa Postal 02372, CEP 70770‑917 Brasília, DF, Brasil.
  • Marta Aguiar Sabo Mendes Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Parque Estação Biológica, Caixa Postal 02372, CEP 70770‑917 Brasília, DF, Brasil.
  • Olinda Maria Martins Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Parque Estação Biológica, Caixa Postal 02372, CEP 70770‑917 Brasília, DF, Brasil.
  • Arailde Urben Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Parque Estação Biológica, Caixa Postal 02372, CEP 70770‑917 Brasília, DF, Brasil.
  • Fernanda Rausch Fernandes Embrapa Quarentena Vegetal, Caixa Postal 02372, CEP 70770‑917 Brasília, DF, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2016.v51.20982

Keywords:

plant protection, germplasm exchange, seed pathology, post‑entry quarantine, sanity of plant material for vegetative propagation, plant health

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate qualitative and quantitative information on interceptions of quarantine and absent non‑regulated pests in imported plant material. Information concerning pest interceptions by Embrapa’s plant quarantine service during the period of 1977–2013 was obtained from a database, laboratory reports, and published lists of intercepted pests. Data interceptions were evaluated according to pest regulations, plant species, imported plant parts, and origin of importation. The plant material was categorized as botanical seeds and plant material for vegetative propagation. In the survey period, 75 pest species were intercepted in 114 interception events. Fungi, viruses, and mites were the most intercepted ones, and most interceptions occurred in lily, olive, wheat, grapes, rice, potato, and apple. The average annual rate of infestation/infection of the evaluated plant material was 2% of the import processes. The material for vegetative propagation had a higher rate of infestation/infection with pests than botanical seeds. Of the intercepted pests species, 63% are not regulated as quarantine pests for Brazil. These results indicate the urgent need to review the current list of quarantine pests in the country.

Author Biography

Arailde Urben, Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Parque Estação Biológica, Caixa Postal 02372, CEP 70770‑917 Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Embrapa

Published

2016-08-03

How to Cite

Lopes-da-Silva, M., Benito, N. P., Sanches, M. M., Marques, A. S. dos A., Návia, D., Gonzaga, V., … Fernandes, F. R. (2016). Interceptions of quarantine and absent non‑regulated pests in imported plant material. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 51(5), 494–501. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2016.v51.20982