Comparative analysis of digital classifiers of Landsat‑8 images for thematic mapping procedures

Authors

  • Danilo Francisco Trovo Garofalo Universidade Estadual de Campinas
  • Cassiano Gustavo Messias Universidade Estadual de Campinas
  • Veraldo Liesenberg Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
  • Édson Luis Bolfe Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite
  • Marcos César Ferreira Universidade Estadual de Campinas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2015.v50.21207

Keywords:

object‑based classification, territorial management, remote sensing, spatial resolution, land use and land cover

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the performance of SVM and K‑NN digital classifiers for the object‑based classification on Landsat‑8 images, applied to mapping of land use and land cover of Alta Bacia do Rio Piracicaba‑Jaguari, in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The pre‑processing step consisted of using radiometric conversion and atmospheric correction. Then the multispectral bands (30 m) were merged with the panchromatic band (15 m). Based on RGP compositions and field inspection, 15 land‑use and land‑cover classes were defined. For edge segmentation, the bounds were set to 10 and 60 for segmentation configuring and merging in the ENVI software. Classification was done using SVM and K‑NN. Both classifiers showed high values for the Kappa index (k): 0.92 for SVM and 0.86 for K‑NN, significantly different from each other at 95% probability. A major improvement was observed for SVM by the correct classification of different forest types. The object‑based classification is largely applied on high‑resolution spatial images; however, the results of the present work show the robustness of the method also for medium‑resolution spatial images.

Published

2015-07-10

How to Cite

Garofalo, D. F. T., Messias, C. G., Liesenberg, V., Bolfe, Édson L., & Ferreira, M. C. (2015). Comparative analysis of digital classifiers of Landsat‑8 images for thematic mapping procedures. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 50(7), 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2015.v50.21207

Issue

Section

REMOTE SENSING