Hydraulic erosion in different tillage systems and soil cover

Authors

  • Wilk Sampaio de Almeida Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Rondônia, Campus Colorado do Oeste, BR 435, km 63, CEP 76.993-000, Colorado do Oeste, RO.
  • Daniel Fonseca de Carvalho Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Engenharia, BR‑465, Km 7, CEP 23897‑000 Seropédica, RJ.
  • Elói Panachuki Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Departamento de Agronomia, CEP 79200‑000 Aquidauana, MS.
  • Wander Cardoso Valim Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Departamento de Agronomia, CEP 79200‑000 Aquidauana, MS.
  • Sonia Armbrust Rodrigues Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Departamento de Agronomia, CEP 79200‑000 Aquidauana, MS.
  • Carlos Alberto Alves Varella Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Engenharia, BR‑465, Km 7, CEP 23897‑000 Seropédica, RJ.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2016.v51.22438

Keywords:

Glycine max, Urochloa ruziziensis, soil and water losses, simulated rainfall.

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate, under simulated rainfall, the effect of soil cover on the erosion of a Typic Hapludalf erosion, in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, in the following crop systems: soybean, under conventional tillage; soybean, under no-tillage; established pasture, without cattle trampling; and exposed soil, as a comparison standard. Digital photographs were taken every 20 days for soil cover estimate, and 60 mm h-1 simulated rainfall was applied on the experimental plots, using a portable sprinkler infiltrometer. Soil losses, quantified every 2 min, ranged from 3.10 to 11.40 Mg ha-1, in exposed soil, and from 0.03 to 0.19 Mg ha-1, in established pasture; water losses ranged from 300 to 555 m3 ha-1, in exposed soil, and from 63 to 229 m3 ha-1, in soybean cultivation under no-tillage. Soil losses decreased with the increase in vegetation cover. In the pasture, the maximum vegetation cover was 98.10%. Conventional tillage has temporary positive effects, which makes the soil more susceptible to erosion than the conservationist systems.

Author Biographies

Daniel Fonseca de Carvalho, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Engenharia, BR‑465, Km 7, CEP 23897‑000 Seropédica, RJ.

http://lattes.cnpq.br/4871187664578422 Seropédica, RJ

Elói Panachuki, Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Departamento de Agronomia, CEP 79200‑000 Aquidauana, MS.

UEMS - unidade universitária de Aquidauana

Wander Cardoso Valim, Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Departamento de Agronomia, CEP 79200‑000 Aquidauana, MS.

UEMS - unidade universitária de Aquidauana

Sonia Armbrust Rodrigues, Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Departamento de Agronomia, CEP 79200‑000 Aquidauana, MS.

UEMS - unidade universitária de Aquidauana

Carlos Alberto Alves Varella, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Engenharia, BR‑465, Km 7, CEP 23897‑000 Seropédica, RJ.

Departamento de Engenharia - UFRRJ

Published

2016-10-17

How to Cite

Almeida, W. S. de, Carvalho, D. F. de, Panachuki, E., Valim, W. C., Rodrigues, S. A., & Varella, C. A. A. (2016). Hydraulic erosion in different tillage systems and soil cover. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 51(9), 1110–1119. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2016.v51.22438