Abiotic resistance inducers for control of pineapple fusariosis

Authors

  • Luiz Gustavo de Lima Melo Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Avenida Dom Manuel de Medeiros, s/no, Dois Irmãos, CEP 52171‑900 Recife, PE
  • Erlen Keila Candido e Silva Universidade Estadual do Maranhão, Laboratório de Fitopatologia, Caixa Postal 09, CEP 65054‑970 São Luís, MA
  • José Ribamar Muniz Campos Neto Universidade Estadual do Maranhão, Laboratório de Fitopatologia, Caixa Postal 09, CEP 65054‑970 São Luís, MA
  • Severina Rodrigues de Oliveira Lins Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Avenida Dom Manuel de Medeiros, s/no, Dois Irmãos, CEP 52171‑900 Recife, PE
  • Antonia Alice Costa Rodrigues Universidade Estadual do Maranhão, Laboratório de Fitopatologia, Caixa Postal 09, CEP 65054‑970 São Luís, MA
  • Sônia Maria Alves de Oliveira Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Avenida Dom Manuel de Medeiros, s/no, Dois Irmãos, CEP 52171‑900 Recife, PE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2016.v51.23841

Keywords:

Fusarium guttiforme, Agro‑Mos, Bion, phosphites, silicate

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of abiotic resistance inducers on the control of pineapple fusariosis (Fusarium guttiforme) in the pre‑harvest period, in an area with natural occurrence of the disease in the field, and to check for any physicochemical and biochemical changes in the fruits. The products tested were potassium phosphite, calcium phosphite, copper phosphite, Agro‑Mos, calcium silicate, Biopirol, and Bion sprayed on the field, at the dosages recommended by the manufacturers. Potassium phosphite, Biopirol, and copper phosphite were the most effective in reducing the incidence of pineapple fusariosis in the field, with 91.67%, 70.01%, and 67.68% of control, respectively. The physicochemical analyses showed that the treatments did not promote change in pH, total soluble solids, and total acidity of fruits, while, in biochemical analyses, only β‑1,3‑glucanase showed lower expression compared with the control (sterilized distilled water), except for the treatment with potassium phosphite. Therefore, foliar fertilization with potassium phosphite and copper phosphite, as well as the treatment with Biopirol, may aid in the control of pineapple fusariosis.

Published

2016-12-02

How to Cite

Melo, L. G. de L., Silva, E. K. C. e, Campos Neto, J. R. M., Lins, S. R. de O., Rodrigues, A. A. C., & Oliveira, S. M. A. de. (2016). Abiotic resistance inducers for control of pineapple fusariosis. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 51(10), 1703–1709. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2016.v51.23841

Issue

Section

PHYTOPATHOLOGY