Acceptability by Girolando heifers and nutritional value of erect prickly pear stored for different periods

Authors

  • Evannielly Thuanny dos Santos Silva Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Unidade Acadêmica de Garanhuns, CEP 55292-270 Garanhuns, PE.
  • Airon Aparecido Silva de Melo Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Unidade Acadêmica de Garanhuns, CEP 55292-270 Garanhuns, PE.
  • Marcelo de Andrade Ferreira Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/no, Dois Irmãos, CEP 52171-900 Recife, PE.
  • Júlio César Vieira de Oliveira Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco, Estação Experimental de Arcoverde, CEP 56500-000 Arcoverde, PE.
  • Djalma Cordeiro dos Santos Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco, Estação Experimental de Arcoverde, CEP 56500-000 Arcoverde, PE.
  • Randerson Cavalcante Silva Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Alagoas, Campus Piranhas, Avenida Sergipe, s/no, Xingó, CEP 57460-000 Piranhas, AL.
  • Jonas Gomes Inácio Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/no, Dois Irmãos, CEP 52171-900 Recife, PE.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2017.v52.24736

Keywords:

Nopalea cochinellifera, Opuntia stricta, Brazilian Semiarid Region, cochineal nopal cactus, forage cactus, post-harvest

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the nutritional value of erect prickly pear (EPP) (Opuntia stricta), stored for different periods, and its acceptability by Girolando heifers. Five heifers were distributed in a 5x5 Latin square. The treatments were as follows: EPP without storage time; stored EPP for three post‑harvest periods – 7, 14, and 21 days; and cochineal nopal cactus (CNC) (Nopalea cochenillifera) without storage time, as a control treatment. The diets offered to the animals were composed of cacti of the different treatments, as well as sugarcane silage and soybean meal, and were evaluated for their chemical composition, intake, and nutrient digestibility. The ingestive behavior of the heifers was evaluated. The cactus EPP did not differ from the CNC for organic matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber corrected for ash and protein, nonfibrous carbohydrates, total carbohydrates, ether extract, and mineral matter; however, EPP stored for different periods differed from CNC for dry matter and indigestible neutral detergent fiber. Heifer weights varied 1.35 kg with the low inclusion of concentrate in the diet. The cactus erect prickly pear maintains constant both its nutritional value and its acceptability to Girolando heifers, after storage for different periods up to 21 days.

Downloads

Published

2017-10-11

How to Cite

Silva, E. T. dos S., Melo, A. A. S. de, Ferreira, M. de A., Oliveira, J. C. V. de, Santos, D. C. dos, Silva, R. C., & Inácio, J. G. (2017). Acceptability by Girolando heifers and nutritional value of erect prickly pear stored for different periods. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 52(9), 761–767. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2017.v52.24736

Issue

Section

ANIMAL NUTRITION