Low‑height castor bean row spacing and plant population for mechanical harvest

Authors

  • Rogério Peres Soratto Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas
  • Genivaldo David de Souza-Schlick Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas
  • Bruno Mesquita San Giacomo Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas
  • Maurício Dutra Zanotto Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas
  • Adalton Mazetti Fernandes Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2011.v46.9457

Keywords:

Ricinus communis, spatial arrangement, yield components, plant density, oil content

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of row spacing and plant population on yield and others agronomic characteristics of low-height castor bean, for mechanical harvest, in the summer cropping season. The experiment was carried out during the 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 growing seasons, on a Haplorthox soil, in Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brazil, using the cultivar FCA‑PB. A randomized complete block design in a split-plot arrangement with four replicates was used. The plots consisted of four row spacings (0.45, 0.60, 0.75, and 0.90 m), and the subplots of four initial plant populations (25,000, 40,000, 55,000, and 70,000 plants per hectare). Increases in plant population, decreased plant survival, stem diameter, number of racemes per plant and number of fruits per raceme, regardless of row spacing. The highest grain and oil yields of castor bean FCA‑PB are obtained with initial plant populations between 55,000 and 70,000  plants per hectare, with the row spacing from 0.45 to 0.75 m. 

Author Biographies

Rogério Peres Soratto, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas

<

Bruno Mesquita San Giacomo, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas


Maurício Dutra Zanotto, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas


Adalton Mazetti Fernandes, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas


Published

2011-06-01

How to Cite

Soratto, R. P., de Souza-Schlick, G. D., San Giacomo, B. M., Zanotto, M. D., & Fernandes, A. M. (2011). Low‑height castor bean row spacing and plant population for mechanical harvest. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 46(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2011.v46.9457

Issue

Section

CROP SCIENCE